Skip to main content

Peer To Peer Lending: You Take All The Risk

A number of peer to peer money lending services have been springing up, some with serious backing, others with strong partnerships, all promising a fairer, friction-free way of lending and borrowing money.
The theory sounds good - remove the banks from the equation and provide better interest rates for lenders and borrowers.
In practice the banks perform important services to both lender and borrower. Those services include vetting potential buyers for credit history and capability to pay; and insulating savers from the risk of bad lending. Admittedly the GFC proved that the banks can get caught out too, but that was a matter of greed and poor oversight, but usually that sort of thing happens behind closed doors and losses get averaged out over the banks portfolio.
With peer to peer lending the company providing the match-making service takes none of the risk and provides little protection for either party. It is in the service's interests to make as many loans happen, whether that is good for the lender or borrower is immaterial. Misrepresenting the risk involved seems like a short step to take to profit in an industry which doesn't exactly have a good name for honesty.
A cautionary tale from an acquaintance of mine, who was impressed by the idea of making more of his savings than the low interest rates that his bank was offering. He invested $1,000 into a peer to peer service, spread across four borrowers. Two of those defaulted leaving him out half of his capital.
People with good credit histories borrow from their banks at lower interest rates than peer to peer services. Which should tell you that those people seeking out a loan from such a service is perhaps not the sort of person that you would trust with your hard earned cash.
Peer to peer lending is something that you will probably hear more and more of in the future, especially as more established finance industry players seek to ride the coat tails of Fintech to profit.
As a lender you should be very wary of what such a service means for your money.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…