Skip to main content

Microsoft Will Monetise Windows Through Office 365

Windows used to be Microsoft's cash cow, quite literally its license to print money. Things have changed recently and customers used to free OS upgrades from Google and Apple have rejected the idea of paying for new versions of their desktop platform. So whilst Windows 10 was growing rapidly whilst Microsoft was giving it away, as soon as the free upgrade ended, so did growth.

Windows income is now restricted to OEM licence sales. With the PC market shrinking that isn't going to keep Microsoft's bottom line healthy.

Microsoft's future income will be centred around two products Office 365 and Azure. The latter will be an enterprise level income stream, based on customers moving their on-premise server infrastructure to the cloud.

Office 365 subscriptions have to drive the rest of the business' s revenue. That means finding more and more ways to get customers to start paying a subscription. With competing, free office suites making Office a limited driver - especially in the high value consumer market - Microsoft has to find another hook.

For Windows users this will almost certainly mean new features in Windows 10 updates becoming two tier. Some for everyone, but the really good stuff restricted to Office 365 subscribers.

For mobile users on Android and IOS, Microsoft isn't building out its software offering out of the goodness of its heart either. At some point in the future these apps will almost certainly become two tier offerings. Standard feature set for free, the good stuff for subscribers only.

It's a strong play for Microsoft, but one that is full of risk. If its products don't offer compelling reasons for upgrading to Office 365 customers will find plenty of alternative options without that restriction.

For those who already subscribe (and Office 365 is far and away Microsoft's most competitive offering) the additional features will be something of a bonus. Enough of a reason for non-subscribers to join? That's not so obvious, yet.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…