Skip to main content

Microsoft Lost The Smartphone Game Because It Never Cared Enough

Microsoft was one of the first to market with a smartphone as we know it today. That's important in the context of what has happened since.

Whilst Google and, particularly, Apple have forged their own path through the new post-PC era, Microsoft spent too much time looking over its shoulders at what competitors were doing instead of focusing on the reason why it was in the smartphone game.

Windows Phone 7, when it launched, offered a truly different way of looking at a mobile platform but Microsoft failed to sell the platform to customers or developers; then watered down its vision with each upgrade in an attempt to draw support in. 

The only problem being that nobody needed or wanted a hybrid version of iOS and Android from Microsoft.

Nokia's switch to Windows Phone briefly looked like it would breathe life into the platform, sales improved, especially in Europe and South America. The company understood the mobile phone business, even if it had blown its own by hanging on to Symbian for too long.

The combination briefly made Windows Phone the platform for users interested in taking better pictures. But having been handed a golden opportunity to give users a reason to switch platforms Microsoft completely failed to embrace it. There were no updates to the platform which focused on imaging and no follow up to the landmark Lumia 1020.

The Lumia 930 / 1520 / 950 all moved the overall quality of smartphone photography on - to the point where the 950 is still the best camera phone you can buy use today.

Yet talk to anybody about smartphone cameras and it is the iPhone or the Pixel which will dominate the conversation.

Microsoft didn't care about winning in the smartphone market enough to take its one major advantage, its most unique selling point and it's real differentiator and build a campaign around it.

The reason? Under Steve Ballmer it wasn't seen as a selling point to the compaany's big enterprise customers and under Satya Nadella the will and desire to be in the game wasn't there and the opportunity wasn't recognised.

It's a missed opportunity which I believe will have major repercussions for Microsoft's long-term business. 


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…

WhartonBrooks Indiegogo Windows 10 Mobile Even More Doomed To Failure Than Usual

WhartonBrooks is currently crowd-funding its latest Windows Mobile smartphone on Indiegogo. If crowdfunding isn't already a bad enough idea, a company trying to crowdfund a Windows Mobile device should be warning enough for you.
Not that anyone seems to be taking the project too seriously. With a few weeks left to run the campaign has managed to ensnare just 2% of its $1.1m target.
If you want a better indication of how few Window Mobile loyalists remain I doubt there is one. Of 3,900 Windows Phone enthusiasts Wharton Brooks was seeking for its new phone, it has managed to entice just 50.
Windows for Phones is dead, even if the corpse hasn't stopped twitching yet.