Skip to main content

Was Price All That Was Holding The iPad Back?

iPad sales posted their first year on year growth since 2013 last quarter, as reported in Apple's earnings call. As I mentioned yesterday the growth in units shipped was not matched by a similar growth in revenue. The average selling price of an iPad fell significantly.

This tells us that the success is entirely as a result of the launch of the iPad - a new entry-level device which was almost completely unheralded at launch.

It appears that Apple's customers aren't falling for the half-baked iPad Pro as a computer story and are seeing the iPad for what it is, a useful third screen for times when a laptop is too cumbersome and an smartphone isn't big enough.

This mirrors my own iPad experience completely.

What is intriguing is that the iPad Air and Air 2 - which the new iPads mirror at a lower price point - weren't a success. Which suggests that iPad buyers are price sensitive - a consideration which hasn't really been in play before. The narrative has always been that customers buy cheap Android tablets and expensive iPads.

Turns out iPad buyers are more price sensitive than originally thought.

Apple appears to have been somewhat guilty of believing its own hype. Ads that show iPad use cases that don't resonate with customers and pricing to reflect functionality which wasn't seen as a benefit to the buyer.

Whether the success of the new iPad causes a rethink in Apple's iPad strategy remains to be seen. The iPad Pro isn't enough of a computer for most users but too much of one for most iPad customers.

Time has come for Apple to decide what it wants the iPad Pro to be. A half-baked computer isn't the right answer, whatever some bloggers think.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…