Skip to main content

Spotify On Xbox Would Be The End For Groove Music


Spotify is by far the most popular on-demand streaming service. Groove Music isn't. In fact when I was a Groove Music subscriber it felt like I could personally move the needle on the NZ Groove charts by listening to a particular artist regularly.

For all that it's not so popular, Groove is still a fantastic service. If you have a Windows phone, a Windows PC and an Xbox you should really make use of its tight integration into Windows 10.

However Groove Music is not so great for Android or iOS users. There's very little reason to stick with the service if your media is primarily consumed on one of these devices.

Now an image of Xbox legend Major Nelson, which appears to show Spotify running on his Xbox, could mean the end of Groove as a service for all users.

With no reason to run on either phone or console, how many users are going to keep using the service on their PCs? I'm not convinced that music consumption on a PC is even a thing for most people.

The only thing Spotify and Microsoft need to achieve to render Groove Music superfluous is integration with Cortana, the one area where Groove is still ahead.

Once that's done users could potentially switch to Spotify without losing any features at all.

Which would be a shame. Groove is by far the best looking music player, on Microsoft's own platforms anyway. It also has features which aren't available elsewhere.

Nevertheless, it hasn't proved to be popular and Microsoft has demonstrated with Windows Mobile that it is prepared to be ruthless with products that don't gain user numbers.

Chopping Groove Music in favour of Spotify would be exactly the sort of move that Satya Nadella's Microsoft would make. Or should I say, will make?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…