Skip to main content

Formula E Montreal Shennanigans Not Settled Yet - Buemi And Abt Face Off On Twitter

Formula E's Montreal season finale ended up being something of a firecracker for outgoing champion Sebastien Buemi, who destroyed one of his race cars in free practice, started with a grid penalty, endured a scrappy race one, at the end of which he verbally attacked three other drivers before first being penalised for an unsafe pit release and then being disqualified for an underweight car.

His championship challenge was undone on a crazy Saturday - although missing the previous race weekend in New York was what really cost him the title.

Buemi's post-race rant was caught on film and spread like wildfire (which I'm sure please the Formula E organisers) with the general feeling being that Buemi had let his passion and frustration at the accident cloud his judgement.

Today Buemi took to Twitter to apologise to his team, Robin Frijns and Anthony Felix Da Costa for his outburst. Pointedly not apologising to Daniel Abt.

Now Buemi may have had more of a valid case to be cross with Abt, who crawled into the pitlane ahead of him, costing him time and then running into the rear of the e.Dams Renault as they left the pits. However Buemi was battling Abt's teammate Di Grassi for the title and using a second car to disrupt a championship battle is a tried and tested racing tactic. To expect anything less is both na├»ve and unrealistic.  

Abt clearly wasn't too bothered by Buemi's snub, he responded on Twitter with a healthy dose of sarcasm.

Whether the exchange is the last to grace Twitter (I suspect it will be) there are almost certainly going to be fireworks when season four kicks off as both drivers are likely to be at the sharp end of Formula E's next championship battle.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…