Skip to main content

Why The New iPhone Won't Be As Pricey As Predicted


It seems as if some Apple watchers are in a battle to boost the predicted price of the rumoured new iPhone higher and ever higher. There are two reasons why this may be the case - either because they are trying to set expectations high so that when Apple announces the actual price they can be amazed at its value; or because they've been warned the price is sky high and are trying to manage expectations on Apple's  behalf.

As John Gruber - Apple's favourite blogger is one of those involved, my guess is that the  actual reason is the former. Not least because I don't believe a sky high price benefits Apple.

Here's why.

Apple is expected to announce three new iPhones this Autumn. A iPhone 7S and 7S Plus, plus the iPhone Pro / X / 8 or whatever it's to be called. The 7S versions are almost certainly going to retain the pricing of the current 7 versions. However they will also be the fourth generation of iPhone to use what is essentially the same hardware.

Customers aren't going to want the 7S. In a normal year I'd expect sales to be down as a result of this lack of change. When there's a new, high end iPhone on offer too, demand is going to be further suppressed. Why? Well who wants to be the sort of person who buys a second best iPhone? Certainly not the sort of people who buy iPhones.

In any given year iPhone sales follow a similar pattern. Average selling price is high just after launch as early adopters grab high end models. Then the ASP falls off over the next three quarters as customers pick the low end models. Those early adopters want the best iPhone available and it's for this reason that iPhone Plus sales have surprised Apple each year since the largest size was introduced.

The later buyers are those for whom price is a sensitive issue and as a result they migrate towards the lower end regular size iPhone, at the lowest memory capacity.

Now imagine a world where the best iPhone is too expensive for the majority of early adopters. Will they choose the next best iPhone or hold their purchase until they can justify it financially? I suspect the latter.

So suggestions of a $1,599 entry level price for the iPhone X would seriously impact overall iPhone sales. Doubly so if the iPhone X is supply constrained. And the negative numbers would fall out of Apple's oh-so important Q1 earnings report.

That's not to say that Apple will be giving its crown jewel away. I'm guessing there will be two iPhone X models only. A 64 or 128GB device, with a price point slightly above iPhone 7 Plus 256GB level - $999-$1099 - and a 256GB model $100 above that.

I don't believe the new model will be supply constrained either - or at least no more so than any other top end iPhone at launch.

For Apple reversing the sales slide of 2016 is absolutely key. For all that its making money hand over fist, its failure to set the world alight with iPad or Mac revisions, the Watch, TV or Apple Music is not great news long term.

Getting the next iPhone launch into the sweet spot is key and overpricing the new model just doesn't fit with that goal.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…

WhartonBrooks Indiegogo Windows 10 Mobile Even More Doomed To Failure Than Usual

WhartonBrooks is currently crowd-funding its latest Windows Mobile smartphone on Indiegogo. If crowdfunding isn't already a bad enough idea, a company trying to crowdfund a Windows Mobile device should be warning enough for you.
Not that anyone seems to be taking the project too seriously. With a few weeks left to run the campaign has managed to ensnare just 2% of its $1.1m target.
If you want a better indication of how few Window Mobile loyalists remain I doubt there is one. Of 3,900 Windows Phone enthusiasts Wharton Brooks was seeking for its new phone, it has managed to entice just 50.
Windows for Phones is dead, even if the corpse hasn't stopped twitching yet.