Skip to main content

What Happens When The Surface Phone Arrives?

Sometime in the near future Microsoft is planning a new smartphone-type device. That statement is intriguing for a number of reasons. 

Firstly, how could Microsoft. a company which has managed to blow its mobile credibility over the last ten years, going to deliver something substantially different than what has gone before? The message coming from Microsoft - Satya Nadella and down - is that the next Microsoft smartphone will be unlike anything currently available.

So when I say smartphone-type device it's because my expectation is that this will be both more and less than a smartphone.

Secondly, how will this release impact on mobile partners? Actually that's a declining number which might make damage limitation rather easier than it might have been. The only partner of note still building Windows phones is HP and Elite x3 is clearly filling a stopgap role until Microsoft is ready with its new design. Why would HP take on this no-win role? Probably in return for some early advantages in building devices for the new Microsoft platform.

Finally, who is going to buy this new device when it launches? Current and past Windows phone owners have been burnt often enough to be extremely cautious of backing Microsoft on smartphones again. Existing iOS owners are far too loyal to Apple and also have phones which entirely meet their needs. Android owners want something cheaper and more flexible than is likely to be in Microsoft's plan.

Which means that a new Surface Phone is going to have to be both game-changing and universally appealing to attract any buyers.

With the maturity of the current smartphone market it's hard to see such a leap being possible.

So what happens when Microsoft launches the Surface Phone (if that is to be its name)? Not very much I'm afraid.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…