Skip to main content

Surface Pro As A Tablet - Windows 10 Wins All Ends Up

Following the recent launches of the 2017 Surface Pro and iPad Pro I've been confidently able to say two things: the iPad Pro has improved its game as a computer and the Surface Pro remains the better choice for most users.

That has been predicated on the usage of the iPad Pro as a computer being compromised by some rather large gaps in capability. It cannot easily transform into a desktop machine, it lacks some of the tools which laptop users take for granted and many of its touch friendly apps are less powerful than full size Windows (or Mac) versions.

The other side of this argument is about how the Surface Pro performs as a tablet. If the Surface Pro is really to be considered the number one hybrid two-in-one device it needs to put up a convincing tablet argument as well as a damn fine 'computer' argument.

Turns out the Surface Pro handles tablet use cases with aplomb. Windows 10 makes for as good a touch interface as it does a keyboard and mouse one. Even with the promise of iOS 11 the iPad just isn't as flexible or customisable. Which leaves the different ways in which a tablet might be used to be considered.

What are the most common uses of an iPad as a tablet? Surfing, email, Facebook and Twitter for starters. All are as good - and many are better - on the Surface Pro when used as a tablet.

Next most popular uses? Music streaming and YouTube. Again as a tablet the Surface Pro can go head to head with the iPad.

On to gaming. Here the iPad has an upper hand by virtue of its huge selection of 'lightweight' games. However Surface Pro counters by having access to a wider selection of more 'serious' games through Steam, GoG or even the Windows Store, where a selection of Xbox Play Anywhere games will sate your desire for hard-core gaming on the go.

For all that it's a real computer and capable of all the real computer tasks you would ask any other PC to do, the Surface Pro is as capable a tablet as the iPad and wins the hybrid argument by miles as a result.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…