Skip to main content

Sorry Vic, Your Argument Is Blown By Your Own Photos

Former Google exec Vic Gundotra is in the news this week for an astonishing attack on Android and Android phones cameras, one which has no grounding in fact and which seems to be derived from the significant backlash which Gundotra's signature product  - Google+ - has been on the receiving end of.

Let's start with the initial comment, that the computationally derived portrait mode photos take with his iPhone 7 Plus are sufficiently good to replace a DSLR.

Wrong - and the photos he's used to demonstrate his argument clearly demonstrate that. If you look around the children's heads in the section of the photo Gundotra posted you'll clearly see the artificial bokeh has done a poor job of detecting edges and produced a soft, feathered edge which looks, frankly, terrible.

In no way does this equate to the job a DSLR, micro 4/3 or even a decent compact camera will deliver in the same situation.

Still its pretty good for a phone camera, no argument there. However it's the point where Gundotra then goes into a rant about Android phones, open source, mixed apps and... well just about everything about Google that seems to be hurting him since his departure three years ago, that it all goes a bit pear shaped.

The iPhone 7 Plus has one of the better phone cameras on the market today. Maybe even the best, but that's entirely open to personal tastes. What is obvious from any fair camera comparison is that there are a whole group of cameras which deliver very similar, excellent results (for phones anyway) in just this sort of situation.

The differences are very minor though and Gundotra's assertion that Android cameras are two years behind the iPhone is laughable, to the point of ridiculing everything else he might claim.

Ultimately the outright best photo quality on a phone is still that of the Lumia 950 - as you'll know if you spend any amount of time reading Steve Litchfield's excellent phone camera comparisons at AAWP. That's a phone that is  two years old. Demonstrating just how much catching up Apple et al have had to do.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…