Skip to main content

F1: Sauber Honda Engine Deal Dead Before A Wheel Has Turned

Sauber's announcement that it would run Honda engines next year came somewhat out of the blue, but in terms of surprises it's knocked out of the park by the follow up which tells us that the deal is off for 'strategic' reasons.

It's likely that the change has more to do with driver placement than any concerns over the reliability or performance of the Honda engine.

Both Mercedes and Ferrari have young driver development programs which require the creation of an unofficial junior team. The limited amount of testing time available to new drivers means that teams often hold onto older, more experienced heads when faster, more promising youngsters are available.

For Ferrari that means that both Antonio Giovinazzi and Charles Leclerc are ready for a move into F1, whilst Mercedes have Pascal Wehrlein installed in a Sauber already. An engine deal with either would certainly come with a guaranteed seat for a young driver.

What does it mean for Honda?

Currently it is looking like McLaren will be switching to Renault engines for 2018. Which would leave Honda without a partner in F1. It could make one of many decisions as a result.

Abandon the sport entirely and find somewhere to lick its wounds - Formula E would seem like a good candidate here. Spend a year developing an entirely new engine which remedies the problems inherent in its current design and then seek a partner for 2019. Which seems an expensive remedy and one which risks another failure down the line.

Most likely though is a partnership with one of the few remaining independent teams on the grid. Red Bull may not be prepared to risk its A team with Honda, but Toro Rosso would be an ideal place to learn the engine and support its development until such time as it's competitive enough to promote to the main team. A similar thing to what it does with drivers.

Otherwise Williams and Force India seem good bets, although Honda would need to fund lost performance earnings for either team if they jumped from Mercedes.

Given Honda's chequered past in F1 it would be disappointing if they were forced out because of the restrictions enforced by the current Concorde Agreement. Nevertheless that looks like a very real possibility at the moment.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…

WhartonBrooks Indiegogo Windows 10 Mobile Even More Doomed To Failure Than Usual

WhartonBrooks is currently crowd-funding its latest Windows Mobile smartphone on Indiegogo. If crowdfunding isn't already a bad enough idea, a company trying to crowdfund a Windows Mobile device should be warning enough for you.
Not that anyone seems to be taking the project too seriously. With a few weeks left to run the campaign has managed to ensnare just 2% of its $1.1m target.
If you want a better indication of how few Window Mobile loyalists remain I doubt there is one. Of 3,900 Windows Phone enthusiasts Wharton Brooks was seeking for its new phone, it has managed to entice just 50.
Windows for Phones is dead, even if the corpse hasn't stopped twitching yet.