Skip to main content

What's Up With Apple Pay In The UK?

Actually is not just Apple Pay but all contactless payments. It seems like the UK is just not set up to use them. 

I've complained about New Zealand not having one hundred percent coverage of contactless payment machines, but there the problem is the few companies and businesses who haven't made the switch. 

It appears the UK is a big step behind. Not only are there fewer PayWave capable machines but fewer people are using them. 

Then there's the £30 usage cap for contactless cards. Apparently this precludes the use of PayWave at all. Something which has been extended to Apple Pay in shopkeepers minds. 

Firstly, a £30+ payment should be possible supported by a PIN, and I don't believe the cap applies to Apple Pay anyway. 

The tokenisation which underlies mobile payment methods is a good thing for security and UK smartphone users need to start paying stores to accept this form of payment by voting with their feet. Abandon a sale at the checkout if contactless payment isn't available to you. 

Is the only way to effect a change which safeguards your financial security. 


Vince said…
I'm not sure what your beef is?

I live in the UK and I use Apple Pay pretty much exclusively - on both phone and watch. I regularly pay for things over £30 too without issue. Whether you can do over £30 or not is down to the merchant in most cases as they can set a limit - but not all merchants limit it - but equally not all merchants realise they do support more - I just try it as a general rule.

Equally not all merchants with contactless even realise they can do Apple Pay - it's not absolutely 100% the case, but almost always if they take contactless they do support Apple Pay.

Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…