Skip to main content

The Coming Ad-ageddon

Last week Apple announced a new feature for its Safari browser which doesn't seemed to have garnered much attention, but which could turn out to be the most important announcement made at WWDC 2017.

The next release of Safari will prevent advertisers following you from site to site using Intelligent Tracking Prevention. That means when you search for something tangible, like a service or product, you won't be seeing ads for the damn thing for ever after.

Together with Google's promise to build ad blocking into Chrome and we see that the turning point for web browsing has finally arrived. Content providers are going to lose access to advertising because the advertisers are going to lose access to consumers. Unlike previous third-party blocking extensions, which will require a small amount of effort to enable, Chrome will enable these by default, preventing the bulk of users from ever seeing adverts.

Advertisers and content providers have had plenty of warning and have failed to do anything to clean up their act. Now the only recourse open to them is to block users from accessing their content. That's hugely counter-intuitive for an industry which relies on eyeballs.

Google intends to follow Adblock's position that acceptable ads should be allowed, however it's unlikelt that it will follow AdBlock and AdBlock Plus and allow users to disable this feature, which will no doubt eventually prompt users to switch to alternative browsers or use a Chrome extension.

That's because Google has a vested interest in keeping the internet ad block free. The whole chain from advertiser to publisher to consumer benefits Google more than it benefits anyone else. Faced with the collapse of its largest revenue generator Google appears to have finally mobilised its forces to try and head off a potential disaster.

The question is, has it left it too late?


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…