Skip to main content

Smartwatch For Buttons: Unisurf U2


Regular readers of this blog will know I'm no lover of the smartwatch. It's not something which I believe anybody needs nor can the manufacturers demonstrate a valid use case for them. Which is why so many are turning into fancy fitness trackers.

What if a smartwatch was cheaper though? And I mean nearly disposable level cheap. Would that make the offering more attractive?

The Unisurf U2 is a cheap smartwatch, which works with both Android and iOS. Is it any good though?

It certainly looks the part. Featuring a curved screen of 1.5" diagonal with a faux-metal surround and a reasonably nice strap, which can be interchanged for other standard watch straps. The screen is bright and colourful, although you'll have to prod the button on the side every time you want to know the time - there's no accelerometer to tell the watch you've raised your arm and are now looking at it. Other smartwatches can't do this reliably, but the Unisurf doesn't even try.

The software is Unisurf's own, so none of the subtleties of Android Wear are here. Nor most of the features. You can configure notifications and they come through to the watch rapidly.

Battery life is claimed to be 72 hours. I must spend an awful lot of time looking at my watch - or take an excessive amount of exercise, because the Unisurf struggled to last a day. Because the U2 uses a charging cradle there's no way of boosting the charge on the go. The U1 smartwatch from the same company uses microUSB for charging, which seems to be altogether more sensible.

It did seem to do a good job of recording steps, although there's not actually any way of doing anything useful with that information. There's no sync app, although you can view some information on your connected phone.

At least connecting to the phone was straightforward. Bluetooth pairing worked first time and the app saw the watch as soon as it was launched. Once connected you can make calls through the U2. Which feels quite cool exactly once, when showing the feature off to colleagues. After that, the reality of of projecting your conversation to all and sundry takes over and you don't do it again.

Other than the limited set of watch faces and the limited number of applications available (Android owners only bizarrely) that's about all you get.

You are getting it all for under NZ$80 (around £50) which is about a quarter of the price of its mainstream smartwatch competitors. So if your requirements are low this might be the ideal smartwatch for you.

Personally it has proved to me that the problem with smartwatches is not the price. It's the whole concept end to end. I'll pass thanks...

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…