Skip to main content

Releasing New iPads With Old Software Seems Like The Wrong Thing To Do


Apple's newest iPad is available on the market today. The new devices bring a number of hardware improvements over their predecessors but without the gloss of iOS 11 it feels like half the shine is missing.

Why release new iPads now? In four months time the new iPhones will be released and the iPad could follow with all of its many strengths intact. Using the new iPad Pro feels somehow underwhelming. It works just like its predecessor.

Yes the new screen is amazing and a little bigger - although don't be fooled, the device has got larger to accommodate the extra inch of diagonal so none of your existing cases will work. The pencil is faster, apparently. Personally I'd say you'll be hard pressed to notice the difference. But most of the hardware upgrades are on things that nobody has been asking for. To my knowledge nobody has said 'those iPad Pros are nice, but I wish the screen was better' or 'I love my iPad but it's just so slow'.

The 'big thing' about the new iPad is what it is able to do with iOS 11.

Maybe that's the problem for Apple. The new generation iPad will share most of its whizz bang features with all other iPads as soon as the update drops. Yes it might be hair faster or nicer to look at, but aside from the faster Pencil response and the extra screen space on the 10.5" model, there's really very little change.

Right now Apple can sell the new iPad Pro on the promise of the future. Hoping customers will choose to upgrade even if their current iPad would be getting all the new features as part of iOS 11 anyway.

Which means I can't see much value in updating anything later than an iPad Air, unless you are going to use the Pencil. The iPad Pro is an expensive machine, you're going to need to see some value for dropping all those dollars for the device and for owners of reasonably recent iPad I don't see it.

This seems to be Apple's biggest issue with its whole iPad business. It can't make new models substantially different from the ones customers already have. Which makes an upgrade much harder to sell.

iOS 11 is what makes the biggest difference on the new iPad Pro and the new hardware, fine as it is, just isn't a powerful enough selling point.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…

WhartonBrooks Indiegogo Windows 10 Mobile Even More Doomed To Failure Than Usual

WhartonBrooks is currently crowd-funding its latest Windows Mobile smartphone on Indiegogo. If crowdfunding isn't already a bad enough idea, a company trying to crowdfund a Windows Mobile device should be warning enough for you.
Not that anyone seems to be taking the project too seriously. With a few weeks left to run the campaign has managed to ensnare just 2% of its $1.1m target.
If you want a better indication of how few Window Mobile loyalists remain I doubt there is one. Of 3,900 Windows Phone enthusiasts Wharton Brooks was seeking for its new phone, it has managed to entice just 50.
Windows for Phones is dead, even if the corpse hasn't stopped twitching yet.