Skip to main content

New iPad Good, iOS 11 Better

When Apple launched the new iPad Pros it set down a marker. More powerful, better to look at and more responsive to user input. All very nice to have, but not really a big step up over what has gone before. Apple improved all of the iPad's strengths, without necessarily addressing any of its weaknesses. 

It's a good upgrade, but not a compelling one. iOS 11 though, is a completely different matter. The newest version of Apple's mobile OS has been targeted at the iPad - much more so than the nominally more important iPhone.

The changes Apple has wrought in its platform fundamentally change the iPad as a product. It is still very much a companion device but now it is one that a user - any user - could consider their primary computing device for a much larger proportion of their use cases.

The light user - email, web, social media and video - is going to find that the new iPad is even better at being their only computer. That won't change. For more demanding users the decision to carry an iPad or a full PC will swing heavily in favour of the iPad once iOS 11 arrives.

Primary computer does not mean only computer. Even those users fully engaged in the iPad world will find there remain gaps which can only be filled with a PC. An iPad doesn't make a particularly good desktop for example, with its restriction to screen mirroring and touch only control.

Now more than ever though, it is clear Apple is moving down a path where its primary computing offering will be the iPad. Better connectivity and viable docking options are maybe just one or two iterations away. 

The changes coming in iOS 11 will benefit all iPad users but most importantly they demonstrate a change within Apple which makes the iPad the primary computing focus within the business.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…