Skip to main content

Microsoft Ads Demonstrate ChromeOS Concerns

Microsoft has released a couple of videos contrasting Windows 10 with ChromeOS for business and education needs, demonstrating concerns over the growth of Google's browser based OS and at the same time suggesting Apple's desktop offerings are no longer a concern.

The growth of Chromebook usage in the US education market is what has driven this change. Google overtook Apple to become the second biggest education platform vendor there last year. Success breeds success, especially in the education market and one school or college reporting good experiences with the lightweight platform will inevitably affect the buying decisions of others.

In business Chromebooks haven't been anything like as successful, however as school kids graduate into the workplace they'll carry their ChromeOS experience with them and I have no doubt that smaller (and some not so small) organisations will begin to consider the benefits of switching to Google.

That has major repercussions for Microsoft's strategy. Building a business in the clouds is a good strategy, so long as a strong wind isn't going to come along and blow it all away. Right now Google and ChromeOS are the big bad wolf, warming up his lungs to huff and puff the whole business model away.

Going ChromeOS? You'll probably want to buy into Google Apps rather than Office. Email? Gmail's got that covered and on-premise infrastructure, well we don't need that anymore. It's a risk to every one of Microsoft's business components: desktop, server and cloud.

So this ad is the first step in a battle for mindshare with ChromeOS. Positioning Windows devices as more secure, more capable and just as good value as Chromebooks in education. In business Microsoft will look to leverage the abundance of Win32 legacy apps which demand Windows, whilst pushing ChromeOS as a limited capability platform.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…