Skip to main content

iPad V Surface: Who Won The Update Battle

So we have now had both the new iPad Pro and Surface Pro unveiled to us, with each looking to claim top seat at the tablet hybrid table. So who produced the better hybrid?

The new iPad Pros gained faster processors, more storage and faster Pencil response.

However the big change will only come when iOS 11 arrives later in the year. Then the iPad becomes much more serious competition for a Windows PC like the Surface Pro. Its the start of a journet which I believe will result in the iPad becoming the touch screen, hybrid Mac replacement which Apple desperately needs.

Serious enough though? That remains to be seen. Windows 10 guarantees access to the whole catalogue of human creation as far as software is concerned. There's nothing you can't do on a Windows PC. Whether you can do it comfortably and quickly is dependent on which model you choose. 

It seems likely that even with the improved efficiency of Windows 10, the Surface Pro m3 will struggle for performance in some apps. Not an accusation which will be made against the iPad Pro. 

Jumping to an i5 Surface Pro would fix this, but at a cost. One which pushes price higher than the iPad Pro will demand.

There's no price equivalent to the new 10.5" iPad Pro in Microsoft's line-up either. Unless of course you're happy to grab the older Surface Pro 4 at its runout pricing.

It's the 10.5" iPad which looks most interesting. The trade off in portability against either the bigger iPad or the Surface Pro looks like one which is well worth making. There's no tradeoff in performance and you start with a reasonable 64GB of storage too.

For my money the iPad has just nosed ahead of the Surface Pro in some areas - especially if you can make do with apps available in the App Store. For most though, the iPad remains a companion device which will sit alongside an existing PC. 

That's where the Surface Pro continues to score as it really can be the only computer you ever need. 


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…