Skip to main content

Getting An iPad Pro Ready For Primary Computing Vs Getting A Surface Pro Ready

So, you've decided that you're going to make the move to a single device which can do everything and free yourself from the tyranny of multiple machines, complex workflows and relying on cloud services for synchronisation.

It's a good plan and, depending on which machine you choose to do this you'll need to get things setup in rather different ways. In either case the goal is to minimise the amount of time you spend on other devices as close to zero as possible.

Starting with the iPad Pro. For starters you'll need to decide how you're going to use the iPad.

If the iPad will be used on your lap you can throw away Apple's keyboard case and search out an alternative which makes the iPad more stable in your lap. In my experience the Brydge Keybord is the best option here.

If you're planning on using the iPad on your desk you'll need a Bluetooth keyboard and one of the available Lightning to display adapters. The iPad's display can then be mirrored to a bigger screen, which will save your eyes, at the expense of your arms, as you'll still need to reach out and prod the screen for most tasks.

Finally if you're going to be using the iPad as a pure tablet you've nothing more to add.

Having established  what hardware you'll need the next step is to look at what tasks you're planning on moving to the iPad. Is the software you use available for the iPad? Is there a third-party alternative. Does either work well enough to replace the tool you're currently using? Do you have the connectivity to peripherals you need?

To use a Surface Pro as your primary computer follow these three steps. Step one, turn it on. Step two, plug standard peripherals in. Step three? To borrow a line from an Apple ad, there is no step three.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…