Skip to main content

Do You Really Need A Type Cover With Your Surface Pro?


Microsoft doesn't include the Type Cover with any Surface Pro and never has done. Aside from Microsoft's new marketing which attempts to place the 2017 Surface Pro as the 'most versatile laptop' and would therefore suggest a keyboard should be in the package, do you actually need the Type Cover?

It's a complaint that has been raised against the Surface tablet line since the launch of the original RT version. Microsoft should bundle the keyboard with the Surface Pro if it is going to persist in making laptop references.

It's a fair complaint, however there are good reasons why Microsoft might choose to do make the keyboard optional. Firstly it reinforces the message that the Surface Pro is a tablet and can do tablet things without needing anything more than the very capable onscreen keyboard and trackpad. And secondly, it allows Microsoft to compete on a like for like basis with the iPad when pricing its devices.

The Type Cover turns out to be an option which almost all Surface Pro buyers take up. Reasonably so. After all if you're going to buy a cover for your Surface you might as well get one which doubles as a pretty good keyboard, turning your tablet into a laptop at the same time.

So whilst you don't have to buy a Type Cover to go with your Surface Pro, most customers choose to do so. With Microsoft choosing to maintain peripheral compatibility across three generations of the Surface Pro now, with every sign of continuing to do so in future, at least you'll only have to do so once.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…