Skip to main content

AR: Who Has It Right, Apple Or Microsoft?


Microsoft has been pushing HoloLens for what seems like forever, making the AR the focus of its next big push. Small wonder then that when Apple announced its own AR offering at WWDC 2017, commentators flagged the early death of both HoloLens and Microsoft's AR ambitions.

It's a rather more nuanced situation which the broad strokes of Apple wins, Microsoft loses paints.

Apple's device AR is far from the first offering, it was one of the launch features of Sony's PS Vita. Like pretty much everything Vita related it didn't really go very far. Few games were announced and it made little in the way of progress, in part no doubt, due to the poor sales of the Vita itself. Sony later re-used the technology in its camera app for Android phones, allowing you to add mini worlds and outfits to subjects in the frame long before the current craze of filters arrived.

However this is Apple we're talking about. It has delivered a platform for developers - ARKit - which will ensure that the brightest and the best are already looking at how they can build great apps which leverage AR. The nature of the solution - via the screen of an iOS device - suggests that the bulk of these apps will be games.

Microsoft has been marketing HoloLens to a completely different market, despite having shown off games in all of its major HoloLens announcements, it's real market is for sales to enterprise. AR benefits those who need access to huge amounts of data which either needs to be expensively acquired or carried around on a device. Examples of scenarios where HoloLens clearly works are easy to find - aircraft maintenance technicians guided by AR prompts, surgeons provided with intelligent assistance via a headset UI, even lawyers being able to pull case law out of the ether in the courtroom.

The two solutions are very differently focused. It seems to me that Apple is a shoe in to take ownership of the consumer market, whereas Microsoft is very definitely after enterprise domination.

Given its early lead with Glass, you have to wonder how this plays out for Google in the future.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…