Skip to main content

Apple’s Customers Mostly Run iPhones With Windows – So Why Exclude Them?

iphone

Apple sells iPhones by the bucketload – 216 million of them last year. In contrast its Mac sales are pitiful. The obvious conclusion is that most iPhone users run their device alongside a Windows PC.

 

Which begs the question, if that’s the case why does Apple make it so hard to run Apple services on a PC.

 

For example, most cloud services provide a File Explorer extension which makes your storage look like another desktop drive. Not iCloud.

 

Apple’s Reminders and Notes services are convenient and capable on the iPhone, annoying web access only on Windows. Apple Messages sync happily between iPhone and a Mac, but totally absent on a PC. Apple Music is accessible via iTunes, but really the software is so awful nobody would choose to install it without a gun to their head.

 

Now Apple’s plan might well be to try and force iPhone customers to choose a Mac next time out but there’s little evidence of that strategy working. Apple’s share of the PC market remains static – at best – and expensive and compromised devices, with limited choice and a narrow market niche aren’t going to change that anytime soon.

 

So Apple needs to step back and make a decision. Is its move towards services as a key revenue stream strengthened or weakened by making more of them usable on Windows.

 

Before leaping to the obvious conclusion remember that the whole sum of the current Apple business, its successes and growth can all be traced to one similarly counter-intuitive decision to make iTunes for Windows and open the iPod to all.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…