Skip to main content

Apple Has A Strategy For India

India is a big deal for smartphone manufacturers. It's a growing market which has low smartphone penetration, pent up demand and growing wealth.


Exactly the sort of conditions which Apple thrives in.

So why is the company selling so few phones in India? It's most recent quarter amounted to just 3% of the smartphone market in the country.

That's likely to grow as Apple starts manufacturing iPhones in India, which gets or around some import duties, allowing the phone's to be more affordable.


Even so, the current iPhone range amounts to a huge investment for most Indians. Too big for many who are just beginning to taste affluence.


Apple's plan to win market share is there pronged. Keep the current range available through official Apple sources, maintaining price and, as a result, desirability and keeping Apple an appraisal brand.


Secondly, encourage third party retailers to sell older phones at cheaper prices. Bringing an iPhone purchase into the realms of the possible for many more customers. An iPhone 5S sells for less than £200, a step discount on the entry level iPhone SE.

Finally keep agitating with the Indian government to be allowed to sell refurbished iPhones into the Indian market, further lowering the barrier to iPhone ownership and bringing customers into the Apple ecosystem much sooner than would otherwise be possible.

Whilst Apple is not greatly concerned with market share, it needs to keep growing its customer base to satisfy shareholders and keep the wheels turning for services and app developers.

India is likely to vie with China as the world's largest consumer market within the next decade. Early exposure to Indian consumers is an important long term strategy and Apple seems to have nailed that down.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…