Skip to main content

Windows 10 S Gives A View Of A Future Windows 10 Default Offering

As predicted several times in the past, Microsoft has finally taking the step of locking down Windows 10 to Windows Store applications only. It is currently only enabled on Windows 10 S, however there are good reasons why Microsoft may choose to make this the default Windows 10 configuration some time in the near future.

By restricting installs to Windows Store apps Microsoft gains two things: control over the way apps work when installed in Windows and control over the security of the Windows platform through keeping the malicious programs out. A more reliable, more secure operating system is what everyone strives for.

However Microsoft has some work to do before it can consider taking this path. First it needs to persuade more publishers to brings their software to the Windows Store. Once, and only once, those gaps are filled Microsoft has half a chance of making this play stick with customers.

There's more than a little work still to do on app quality, getting rid of the garbage and ensuring that quality apps, whether they be first or third-party, aren't hidden behind a layer of we wrappers and other hare-brained attempts to bring holdout applications into the Windows 10 world.

Once those issues have been cleared it would make sense for Microsoft to go down a softly-softly route with the Windows Store. Taking the Apple option of restricting installations to the Windows Store by default. Giving users the choice of how restrictive they want things to be will go a long way to avoiding the negative response that previous decisions like Xbox One restrictions and Windows 10 forced upgrades have caused.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…