Skip to main content

Why Your Next Phone Will Be An iPhone


Android has a comfortable lead on the smartphone sales race, with between 80 and 90% of new sales going to Android OEMs. However when you come to buy your next phone it is increasingly likely that it will be an iPhone and that's as it should be.

Right now if you buy a premium Android phone there's a good chance that you won't be getting any security updates after it's six months old. You may get a platform upgrade, assuming your phone's manufacturer feels that it is worth doing, but there are few guarantees. By the time it's eighteen months old you'll have something which is out of date, probably insecure and almost certainly without value

Buy an iPhone and you're covered for the next four years for updates and upgrades; and you'll have a device which is worth substantially more as a result. 

Sure there's plenty of things an Android phone might be able to do that an iPhone can't but chances are you won't ever want to do them anyway.

What's more relevant is that you will be able to do mobile banking and mobile payments with a high degree of confidence that your financial data isn't going to get be exposed by an unpatched weakness or rogue piece of software. 

With Apple now offering the widest selection of iPhones ever, plus a thriving third party ecosystem - the gift which keeps on giving - the buying decision leans towards Apple harder than ever.

Sure the Galaxy S8 is probably the best phone money can buy today, but how long will it be kept up to date? As soon as the S9 arrives the current king of the crop will struggle to get any attention off Samsung. Even the big Android OEMs are too focused on selling their latest and greatest to worry about supporting last year's model.

In fact the only device which guarantees updates is the Pixel from Google. Which is as expensive as the equivalent iPhone and, if past performance with the Nexus line is any indicator, you'll still only see platform upgrades for two year. And as Google has eroded stock Android's advantages over iOS by removing things like storage expansion, MHL, USB-MSC, Miracast; and delivered its best software to the App Store, there's very little to compel you towards a Google phone.

The best Android phones come from Sony, HTC, Huawei and Samsung. The most up to date come from Google.

It's a conundrum that's easily avoided by picking an iPhone. And, Chinese market collapse aside, it seems that more and more customers are choosing to do so.

To work this out Google needs to really fix its problems with getting updates to devices. So far it has talked a good game and not delivered. That has to change, otherwise you, me and every other smartphone customer will gravitate towards Apple and Google will find itself just as firmly booted out of the smartphone market as Microsoft.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…