Skip to main content

Why Apple Had To Deliver iTunes As A Windows Store App


One of the two key apps I identified as being affected by the delivery of Windows 10 S will be coming to the Windows Store - validating Microsoft's decision to lock down its new Windows SKU for consumers and students.

Apple will be releasing iTunes for Windows Store because it can't afford to let a large proportion of Windows 10 buyers think that they have no path for connecting iOS devices to their new computers. If the sales of the iPhone were impacted by the inability to connect to Windows, Apple would find itself in a very bad position indeed.

You may think connecting your phone to a PC is something you would never do and so couldn't actually care less about putting iTunes on your computer anyway. After all who syncs their phone with their PC in the cloud age?

However, despite what some people will tell you, Apple has a less than perfect record with iOS updates, leading to locked or bricked devices, in varying numbers, after a new version of iOS is shipped. The solution? Connect your iPhone or iPad to iTunes and you're usually good to go.

Now imagine a scenario where the 100 million new PC buyers this year - many of whom will be likely to be getting Windows 10 S - are unable to restore their bricked iOS device because iTunes isn't in the Windows Store.

Wouldn't be the sort of customer care Apple is expected to deliver.

So iTunes in the Windows Store tells us two things: Apple expects Windows 10 S to be a success and maintaining its customer's experience remains sufficiently important to Apple that it is prepared to swallow its pride and support a new Microsoft platform.

Now, I wonder if Apple will also see this as an opportunity to make a play for the desktop music streaming space and redevelop iTunes for Windows to be a Groove / Spotify competitor?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…