Skip to main content

Satya Nadella Seems Confused About Microsoft's Phone Business


Windows Mobile fans disappointed with the path the platform has taken in the last two years may finally have some clarity on the reasons for the spectacular failure of Windows on phones: Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella doesn't have a clue what's going on.

Interviewed for the Make Me Smart podcast Nadella spends some time answering questions about several topics, but host Molly throws him a curveball with a direct question - will you make phones again?

Nadella's response is 'we make phones today'. Actually Satya, I don't think you do. Your recent financial report marked less than $5m revenue from phones and your SEC filing stated you aren't planning on booking any more revenue from phones either.

You might be selling off the last dregs of the stock you did make, but today, right now, unless you have a secret factory in Asia somewhere preparing for the biggest surprise launch ever, you aren't making phones.

Nadella goes on to claim that Microsoft has focused on 'this one particular feature: Continuum'. Utter drivel once more. Exactly how far has Continuum come in the two years since its launch? Nowhere, that's how far. Samsung released the DeX with the Galaxy S8 and it comprehensively outdoes Continuum in every area. Samsung! They aren't even a platform builder.

If that's evidence of Microsoft applying focus, God help them.

Nadella even manages to demonstrate a selective view of history in his interview, claiming that 'no-one' had thought of 2-in-1 devices before Microsoft came up with the Surface. Might I remind you of the Asus Transformer, a device that arrived years before the Surface and Surface Pro. Still, let's not mere facts get in the way of a good story.

All in all a pretty disappointing performance from Microsoft's CEO.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…