Skip to main content

Microsoft And HTC: How Did They Blow Mobile?


Back in the early post-iPhone days when Android was new and nobody knew what direction the smartphone market was going, I posed a question: how would HTC fair without Windows Mobile? Was Microsoft holding HTC back or was HTC making Windows Mobile look bad? 

This was after probably two of the best Windows Mobile devices ever made: the Touch Pro 2 and the legendary HD2. Two devices that stood comparison to contemporary iPhone and Android devices. 

Wind the clock on seven and a half  years from the HD2 and things look bleak for both partners.

Microsoft has struggled through three major revisions of Windows for phones, losing partners and customers along the way. It briefly dallied with hardware with both the Kin and Lumia with disastrous and expensively disastrous results respectively. Microsoft is out of the smartphone business. Its losses over the years since ditching Windows Mobile 6.5 must be of titanic proportions and at the end of it all it has given the mobile market away to Apple and Google. 

HTC hasn't fared quite so badly. In fact for a while the HTC Desire was the best and most coveted handset on the market. Then the Samsung Galaxy stole its thunder and the rest is history. A succession of missteps, mis-judged design decisions and truly terrible marketing campaigns has seen the former market leader consigned to the gutter, offering derivative handsets a with rapidly diminishing sales. 

A backward step into contract manufacturing the Google Pixel may well have saved HTC, but its losses and sales problems seem to have doomed the HTC brand. 

Could things have turned out differently? 

Had Microsoft and HTC strengthened their alliance in 2009 and developed Windows Mobile 6.5 in the way that the HD2 and HTC's Sense skin were taking it there may have been an opportunity. Certainly WM6.5 had features and capabilities that iOS and Android took years to match. Even if the march of the iPhone would have been unchallenged by new WM6.5 devices, the rise of Android could have been somewhat stymied by Microsoft. 

Ultimately we are left with a lot of 'what if' questions. Depending upon your view of WM6.5 - and it was a polarising platform - your answer will vary. What is certainly true is that for Microsoft it couldn't have delivered a worse outcome or cost more money than the road it actually pursued.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…

WhartonBrooks Indiegogo Windows 10 Mobile Even More Doomed To Failure Than Usual

WhartonBrooks is currently crowd-funding its latest Windows Mobile smartphone on Indiegogo. If crowdfunding isn't already a bad enough idea, a company trying to crowdfund a Windows Mobile device should be warning enough for you.
Not that anyone seems to be taking the project too seriously. With a few weeks left to run the campaign has managed to ensnare just 2% of its $1.1m target.
If you want a better indication of how few Window Mobile loyalists remain I doubt there is one. Of 3,900 Windows Phone enthusiasts Wharton Brooks was seeking for its new phone, it has managed to entice just 50.
Windows for Phones is dead, even if the corpse hasn't stopped twitching yet.