Skip to main content

iPad V Surface - What's Next?

Within the space of a month Microsoft and Apple have events upcoming, with both rumored to be the stage for new hardware launches. With both seeing declining sales are the next six weeks going to be crucial in the battle between tablet and hybrid?

The rumors of a new Surface Pro have been slightly tempered by Panos Panay's promise of a Surface Pro 5 only when Microsoft has something new to offer. That doesn't preclude a updated SP4 though. It may be a limited upgrade though, given what appeared on the Surface Laptop. A new processor might be the extent of Microsoft's ambitions, but then the SP4 is still the best hybrid you can buy, which might mean that this is sufficient to keep sales going for a little while longer.

Of course SP4 sales are down - is eighteen months old after all. Still it's a new phenomenon for Microsoft, sales being impacted by waiting customers eager for what is coming next.

For Apple it's a very different story. New iPad Pros have failed to halt the iPad's three year losing streak. Which means that whatever comes next has to be a significant improvement on what has gone before.

The current iPad does nothing to provoke buyer desire. It's an eBook reader, video player, email and Internet device to be used as a second screen when watching TV. Every iPad ever sold still fulfills that requirement. Why upgrade, especially when you're saving up for the rumored iPhone 8, which is going to cost a small fortune?

Your iPhone is always by your side. Your iPad rarely so.

Apple needs to make a new iPad which is more of a computer and less of a companion. Whether that appears at WWDC next month is another matter. When it does come it has to take the game to Microsoft, if Apple wants to maintain its computer business anyway.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…