Skip to main content

Global Ransomware Attack Should Have Google Quaking In Its Boots


Around 200,000 PCS running old or unpatched versions of Windows were caught in this week's ransomware meltdown, with global and very high profile consequences. Whilst many are trying to lay the blame at Microsoft's door that's both disingenuous and a demonstration of personal bias. 

Windows XP has been out of production for nearly a decade and out of extended support for more than three years. Microsoft patched the vulnerability in supported platforms months ago. Businesses still running XP or failing to apply Windows updates have only themselves to blame. 

However, imagine a scenario where half a billion devices were to be affected, locking users out of their phones, files and basic communication. 

That's the scenario Android faces as Google fails to resolve the problem of fragmentation and deliver a cohesive strategy for security updates across the Android estate. Less than 5% of Android users were on the latest version of the platform by the end of April. Nearly two-thirds were on a two year old version of Android.

And for customers this has the potential for a significantly larger downside. It's not hard to imagine a vulnerability which allows a hacker to robocall premium rate phone numbers, racking up a much bigger take than the current hack might gain.

So while the fallout from this particular attack has been enormous, the prospect of something similar happening on Android is a whole magnitude worse. And unlike Microsoft, which shoulders very little of the blame for this week's attack, Google would be skewered for the lack of support provided to Android users.

Right now Google can only hope it's older Android platforms are secure, because it has backed itself, its OEMs and carriers into a corner with its upgrade process. That isn't a good place to be. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…