Skip to main content

Essential Doesn't Have The Essentials Right

Andy Rubin, co-founder of Android, announced his new smartphone today. Called the Essential, it rocks a near bezel free design, stock Android and expansion capability through wireless USB.

The danger is that Rubin has made the same mistake as others who have designed phones for the enthusiast, pushing the things that most customers aren't really interested in.

The Essential is targeted at the premium Android market. That means its going to sell in limited numbers - the sector isn't big and it's dominated by Samsung.

Does the Essential look like a device that can compete with the Galaxy S8?  I'd suggest not.  Samsung has made the S8 attractive by virtue of both its hardware and software. Essential's use of stock Android means limited integration of the platform and the hardware.

The S8's hardware is just that bit more impressive too.

There is one feature that might make a difference though, the ability to expand with new hardware through an expansion port. A device unique expansion didn't work for LG or Motorola, Essential promises that its wireless USB will be an open standard, but unless it  gains wide adoption that's likely to be an empty promise.

There's not a lot that's new or innovative about the Essential either. Realistically that's because there aren't any big gaps in the way smartphones work. Rubin talks about Essential building a more personal phone, but aside from leaving branding of the phone it's hard to see where this applies.

The Essential is a very niche device.  One which will speak to those interested in the more technical aspects of owning a smartphone.

For everyone else an iPhone or Galaxy S8 looks a  more complete option.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…