Skip to main content

Apple Halved iPad Sales In Just Three Years


Apple's financial results were pretty impressive, but iPad sales continued to tank, to the point where they are half of what they were for the corresponding quarter three years. Go back four years and Apple was selling nearly twice as many computers - iPads and Macs - as it is today.

In that time revenue has fallen from more than $14bn to less than $9bn. Apple has serious issues with selling computers, even it is masked in financial results by the success of the iPhone (mostly) and a handful of other products.

Tim Cook has been talking up the computer business - Apple is 'investing aggressively' in Mac and iPad sales are outperforming expectations - yet it still feels like it is being outgunned in the PC market by Microsoft, with superior design, and its Windows partners who have managed to leverage Microsoft's reference works to produce hardware which is both clever and has a great value proposition.

The premise behind the iPad and Mac co-existing is that customers will end up owning both. That doesn't seem to be playing out and the crescendo of complaints about the half-hearted MacBook Pro upgrade bears that out. The Touch Bar was a weak, novelty item, which had no place on a professional machine.

Apple has been treading water with laptop and tablet designs that are years out of date.

The solution remains, as it always has been in my opinion, the merger of Mac and iPad into one hybrid device. Whether its dominant parent is a Mac or an iPad doesn't matter. What matters is that it arrives.

Because if customers are prepared to buy Microsoft hybrids at premium prices just how many Apple hybrids do you think the market will suck up?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…