Skip to main content

United Airlines Assault On Passenger Evidence Of Contempt For Passengers


US airlines have traditionally used a system of overbooking seats to ensure that flights are always as close to full as possible. It's a hedge against no-shows and cancellations and occasionally it goes wrong. When it does and the airline finds itself packing more paying passengers than seats what tends to happen is the company will offer passengers inducements to take a later flight. Cash, vouchers, loyalty points.

United Airlines found itself with a group of passengers who steadfastly refused any inducement to switch flights, so staff randomly picked four passengers to be thrown off the flight. One of those passengers, a doctor returning home, was selected but refused to comply, claiming he had appointments booked with patients for the following morning.

United had the passenger forcibly and violently removed from the plane. Video of the incident has been widely shared on the Web. 

This wholly unacceptable action demonstrates the contempt the US airline industry holds its customers in, treating them as little more then cattle. United went one better than most though. Its reason for throwing paying customers off the flight? It had four members of staff who needed seats.

The whole drama resulted from the airline's inability to manage seats for its own staff. And just when it seemed things couldn't get worse the airline's CEO sent out a memo blaming the customer for his predicament, in the face of video evidence to the contrary.

All this coming just weeks after United refused to fly girls because they were wearing leggings.

US travellers have an opportunity to punish this behaviour with their wallets. Failure to do so would suggest that they really are the cattle their carriers treat them as.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…