Skip to main content

Huawei CEO Down On Smartwatches

Smartwatches have proven to be a difficult market for technology companies, with actual sales turning out to be much lower than the industry was expecting for the next 'big' thing.

Partly, that's because it's difficult to demonstrate real value for a smartwatch against a real watch or a fitness tracker. Even Apple has struggled and has had to add more fitness features to the Watch to try and drive sales.

Huawei's current CEO was reported as saying he saw no value in smartwatches - right at the time the company launched its latest Android Wear devices. Ten out of ten for honesty, zero out of ten for business savviness. If the company's sales and marketing people can't drive excitement for a product from their own management teams you have to question the logic of bringing it to market.

The smartwatch market feels like something which needs to have its iPhone moment. In the same way the smartphone market played to a small number of business email users and nerdy technology enthusiasts prior to the iPhone, and became the must have consumer product immediately after; the smartphone industry plays to a very small percentage of potential customers.

Adding features isn't really going to create the step change which makes a smartwatch as irresistible as a smartphone. The feature sets on Apple, Android and Samsung watches cover at least the 80% of usage one would expect a smartwatch to cover.

There just seems to be no demand for those features on the wrist, when the smartphone is just a pocket grab away.

When even those people charged with selling a product don't understand it and can't explain why you might need it, market growth is going to be slow.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…