Skip to main content

F1: Honda Needs To Abandon Reliability, Push For Performance

F1 must be a pretty painful experience for Honda right now. After a pretty disastrous couple years under the 2014 engine formula the company must have been hoping the new 2017 rules for F1's turbo hybrids would put them back in the game.

That has proved to be far from the case, With McLaren battling customer engine powered teams like Haas, Sauber and Toro Rosso in the lower midfield.

Given that its last foray was similarly disastrous - between 2000 and 2008 it achieved a single Grand Prix victory - a fortuitous result in Hungary in 2006 in a weather affected race - this shouldn't be a surprise.

Honda withdrew from F1 at the end of 2008, humbled. Its works effort had achieved one victory in nine seasons. The scale of that failure illustrated by the efforts of private Honda tuner Mugen, who took four race wins in the preceding nine years with its Honda based units.

In fact a golden period between 1986 and 1991 aside (collecting six constructor's and five driver's World Championships) Honda has been a perennial struggler.

Honda has clearly experienced major issues so far this season and it is rapidly losing the faith of its McLaren partner. That of lead driver Fernando Alonso is long gone.

Which leaves only one option for Honda, throw caution to the wind, build for performance and take the pain (and penalties) of repeated engine failures. Reliably running around battling for the last point is good for nobody. On the other hand a short show of blistering pace would be good for everyone's morale, even if it were to come to a premature and fiery end.

The exception being Monaco of course, where a horsepower deficit is far less important than the rest of the Grand Prix calendar. And where the guile and experience of Jensen Button might be sufficient to bring home a good result.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…