Skip to main content

Australian Banks Lose Ability To Collectively Lobby For iPhone NFC Access


A group of Australian banks have been lobbying the country's Competition and Consumer Commission for the right to negotiate collectively with Apple for access to the NFC chip which enables contactless payments.

Aside from ANZ, none of the big Australian banks have adopted Apple Pay, claiming that prevent access to the NFC chip in the iPhone puts them at a competitive disadvantage in developing their own payment apps.

The attempt to bargain collectively was rejected on the basis that Apple competes with Android by offering customers a closed system and forcing the company to give the banks access would damage its competitiveness in the smartphone market.

The argument has imapcted on the roll out of Apple Pay for Australian and New Zealand customers. Even ANZ, which broke the cartel and started offering Apple Pay to its customers late last year, hasn't been quick to market with its offering. ANZ's GoMoney wallet offered contactless payments on Android phones a year earlier.

Australia's remaining banks have said that they will continue to fight their case with Apple on an individual basis, although that's a move which seems ripe for failure.

Alternatively the banks could push forward with Android Pay and target the greater number of Android smartphone users in the Australian population. Not having to pay the Apple Pay tax may even give them the opportunity to create a competitive advantage.

What they can't do though, is expect to hold off on Apple Pay forever, because Australia is a big iPhone market and customers will vote with their feet, changing banks before phones.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…