Skip to main content

Apple Will Fix The Mac Pro - Next Year

Apple picked a handful of its most friendly bloggers to meet the big guns yesterday, having them with the news of a speed bump for Mac Pro's, an all new Mac Pro lineup next year, and updated iMacs and Apple monitor ranges.

Why did the ever so famously 'tight lipped on new products' company feel the need to do this? Probably because a regular announcement would have had them drowned in derision.

It's clear evidence that Apple really did forget about its desktop using Pro's for the two years.

Phil Schiller, Craig Ferderighi and John Ternus spoke about the reasons behind the updates to the Mac Pro and its replacement.

That amounted to an admission that sounded like 'we thought we could rely on our Pro community to buy any old crap, based on their strong loyalty. Turns out they won't and we've had to hustle together a backup plan that we're trying to frame as a good thing by using our favorite cheerleading team'.

Apple backed themselves into a corner by designing the Mac Pro from the outside in, making it difficult to upgrade. That it will take until next year to replace it (five years after it arrived on the market, no less) shows exactly how much notice Apple has been taking of its small, but vocal, professional community.

These guys have been telling Apple the Mac Pro isn't for them almost since day one.

The right thing to announce yesterday would have been the new Mac Pro lineup, instead, by telling users that the new machines are a year away Apple basically admitted to doing nothing about its problem until the last few months.

Writing on his blog one of the cheerleaders suggested "You’re committed to your pro users, but a sizable chunk of them are growing ever more restless. They suspect — in some cases strongly — that you don’t care about them anymore".

Yesterday's news shows that they were absolutely right.



Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…