Skip to main content

Will Apple Deliver A Universal App Platform?

MJYR2_FV406

Developers are deserting the Mac App Store, the iPad is losing customers and Apple is zagging towards a more services led business model. It really needs to consider a unified platform that allows developers to code once and publish to an iPad and Mac app store seamlessly.

I know that the UWP has been less than successful for Microsoft but at least part of that is down to Microsoft's reliance on a single platform to validate its offer to write once, run anywhere.

At the moment there are around 450 million devices running UWP capable operating systems. 420 million of those are running Windows. Those 420m PCs, plus the billion others running older versions of Windows, create their own de facto universal platform: Win32. If you're writing software for profit this is the place to be, the rest (Xbox, Windows Mobile, HoloLens) amounts to little more than a rounding error.

Apple is rather different. There are rather more iPads in use than Macs. The proportions are much more even though. Being able to deliver a piece of software that runs both on a Mac and an iPad shouldn't be too challenging for a developer and should also pay off handsomely.

Right now iPad apps suffer the pricing problems of being seen as a mobile app, with mobile app support and maintenance overheads. Tie the two stores together and the app becomes a piece of software, with the pricing capability of a Mac program.

Performance shouldn't be an issue - performance of the iPad Pro should closely mirror that of the MacBook, at though Apple may have to boost RAM on its tablets for this to work well.

The real benefit for Apple would be a channel towards building a true hybrid device able to compete with the rising tide of 2-in-1 Windows tablets. The only area of the PC/tablet market that is growing.

I wonder if Apple's new iPad Pro 2 will support mouse input when it launches? Because I believe this will be the first indication of Apple's intent to bring Mac and iPad together.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…