Skip to main content

Who Still Has The Ability To Build A Smartphone Which Makes Your Wallet Twitch?

Funny thing about the modern smartphone market. Ten years on and we've reached a level of maturity which has removed the excitement for those of us old PDA hands who have been leaping from platform to platform since Psion first launched its Organizer back in the eighties.

Smartphones have become dull, with each new version offering a slight iteration over the outgoing model. Whilst OEMs crow about amazing new features, once they arrive in the customer's hands they turn out to be mostly underwhelming.

Apple has now released what is basically the same phone three years on the bounce. Yes the camera has changed and it performs a little better but the difference between an iPhone 6 and 7 is minor in actuality. With a case on nobody knows whether you've got a brand new iPhone or a rattly old one. I imagine that accounts for a large proportion of lost iPhone sales in China for example.

The same is true of Samsung, Huawei or HTC.

So who really manages to get your nerd juices flowing? LG, with their scattergun approach to random features for the sake of features? Motorola with some rather more targeted left field options? Microsoft's Continuum is probably the most biggest thing to happen to smartphones in a while, but even then its usefulness is in question, even on the enterprise-focused, cleverly accessorised HP Elite x3.

I fancy that Apple will have something new and exciting for its fans when it launches its new iPhone later in the year. But even then it will likely be as a result of implementing features others have had for years. Much like the iPhone 6 'invented' big screens. 

Since the arrival of Windows 10, we're seeing rather more innovation in the PC market than the smartphone market - a complete and utter reversal of historical positions.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…