Skip to main content

Sony Can't Do Fingerprint Readers In The US, Deal With It

When Sony added a fingerprint reader to the side of its premium Xperia range a couple of years ago the feature was conspicuously missing from devices bound for the US. Every Sony Xperia launched since has the same limitation.

On more than one occasion Sony has hinted that there are legal issues behind the absence of this feature and this week at MWC under probing from Android Central slipped slightly more information, suggesting the absence is related to contractual issues with one of the US carriers. Most likely Verizon.

This hasn't stopped the almost constant barrage of comments and complaints about the missing fingerprint scanner, many along the lines of "I won't buy another Sony phone until they fix this".

If it isn't plain enough already: this is out of Sony's control. Until such time as the contract framing this absence has expired there will be no active fingerprint sensors on Sony devices sold in the US.

Active? Why yes, because the fingerprint sensor is there just absent the software to enable it.

So American smartphone friends you have three options: buy a US Xperia and flash a non-US ROM to enable the sensor or import an Xperia from outside of the US. The first option demands you carefully follow the (widely available) instructions for updating you ROM, whilst the second demands that you research the LTE bands match those you require in the US. Neither is particlarly onerous, even if it is more effort than just walking into a carrier store and picking one up.

I mentioned a third option, well that's seems to be by far the most popular one unfortunately, which is to go out and buy something else. It's a shame, because it's clear that Sony has piqued customer interest with its recent devices. Until such time as Sony is free of legal encumbrances though, neither Sony nor American smartphone buyers will be free to fully benefit from the devices being produced.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…