Skip to main content

Smartphone Vs Camera: Are you Really Getting The Best Shots?


The best camera is the one you have with you right? Which is why the majority of snaps taken today come from a smartphone. The compact camera is dead, but just how good are those snaps when compared against today’s compact cameras and does such a thing have a place in your every day carry after all?

Financially, smartphone manufacturers often use the camera as a differentiator between smartphones in different market sectors. The expensive top of the range iPhone 7+ packs one of the best cameras you can get in a smartphone and for the privilege you pay a premium price. Google tries to make the same distinction with the Pixel. In fact every smartphone OEM reserves its best camera for its best phone.

If you were to remove the camera from the equation, does a high end smartphone still make sense?

That iPhone 7+ costs NZ$1429, $230 more than the entry-level iPhone 7. You could purchase a reasonably high spec compact camera for close to that sum and end up with something far more capable.

The Sony DSC-W830 or Canon IXUS 180, for example, cost s than that $230 price difference and feature an 8-times optical zoom and a significantly more capable lens configuration. Are your photos important enough that you’d consider the extra bulk of a separate camera? Either one is certainly small enough to fit in a pocket, or occupy the minimum of space in a laptop bag.

Both feature Wifi and NFC for quick sharing of your photos to your smartphone, so if you want to post that photo you can do so without any fuss.

Step up a little in size and cost and you'll gain even more capability, as well as advanced manual and priority modes that will allow you achieve photos that are in a different league to any smartphone. The faux portrait modes of the iPhone 7+ and Huawei P9 look pretty tame when compared to something like the $350 Panasonic Lumix TZ57 which can deliver the real thing.

Smartphone cameras have been improving over the last five years, but really only one or two have been suitable for more than just snaps. The Lumia 1020 was the best of those, but it's a long time gone now.

For all the subsequent improvements which have raised the level of smartphone camera capability there’s still a gap that can't be bridged with clever software.

So, if your snaps are mostly just snaps for posting on social media and layering up with filters, a smartphone camera will do the job for you. 

However if you’re photos are going to be about memories and you attach significance to what you’re capturing, then you might want to consider the value of a better camera in your backpack.

So if the best camera is the one you have with you, why aren't you carrying a better camera?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…

WhartonBrooks Indiegogo Windows 10 Mobile Even More Doomed To Failure Than Usual

WhartonBrooks is currently crowd-funding its latest Windows Mobile smartphone on Indiegogo. If crowdfunding isn't already a bad enough idea, a company trying to crowdfund a Windows Mobile device should be warning enough for you.
Not that anyone seems to be taking the project too seriously. With a few weeks left to run the campaign has managed to ensnare just 2% of its $1.1m target.
If you want a better indication of how few Window Mobile loyalists remain I doubt there is one. Of 3,900 Windows Phone enthusiasts Wharton Brooks was seeking for its new phone, it has managed to entice just 50.
Windows for Phones is dead, even if the corpse hasn't stopped twitching yet.