Skip to main content

F1: Vettel Victory Means Nothing Without Context

P1000182 (2)

Sebastian Vettel’s victory in Melbourne was a source of real joy for everyone in F1. After three years of tedious Mercedes processions, barely interrupted by breakdowns and inter-team tangles, the sight of a Ferrari out-racing Mercedes was widely welcomed.

It is being heralded as a new dawn for F1, the end of Mercedes dominance. It wasn’t, and we could still be in for another season of the same old Silver Arrow procession.

The real relative performance between the cars was better indicated by the Bottas / Raikonnen battle. The Ice Man was never in contention.

There are two things which make me wary of heralding a new dawn. Vettel should have won this race last year, but for a botched Ferrari strategy call. Mercedes went on to dominate the rest of the season. This year Vettel’s victory rested on a mistake by Hamilton and Mercedes. By running on used ultra soft tyres in qualifying two, Hamilton was forced to start on rubber that had at least six laps of use.

Those tyres wore much more quickly than those on the Ferrari, Vettel was able to run for five more laps after Hamilton pitted and only stopped then because Ferrari knew they had the gap to stop and rejoin still in the lead, and were presumably worried that Max Verstappen might have stopped and released Hamilton to lap faster.

Mercedes one weakness over the last few years has been tyre degradation. The high temperatures in Melbourne, when  added to the used tyres Hamilton’s car started on, compromised Mercedes pace.

The second thing was the quality of Vettel’s race. Fast aggressive and right on it. From trackside it was obvious that Vettel was flying closer to the limit than anyone else. At the exit to the turn 9 / 10 Clark complex Vettel was closer to the wall than anyone. At turn 16 he played with the limits of adhesion of even the new, wider rubber, again more so than any other competitor..

It was a superhuman effort, worthy of a Schumacher or a Gilles Villeneuve, two other heroes in red. Nothing was left in the locker.

To expect this perfect storm of factors to even out the gap at every race weekend this year is foolish. Only a run of extremely hot, summer races plays to Ferrari’s advantage. We haven’t had a lot of those in recent years.

China will give us a much better picture of where the new cars stand. I suspect that Mercedes will regain the initiative there, adding to their tally of four wins in the last five races.

If Ferrari (and Red Bull) are able to compete with Mercedes in Beijing, then we can talk about a Championship battle being in prospect.

Comments

Vinolan Pillay said…
Seems like you a Mercedes supporter which makes for a bias read. If we take everything into context Hamilton and Mercedes were well of the race pace. Besides their qualifying laps they really had nothing to shout about and lets be real the race is not won in qualifying. Their race pace was way of and i can garuantee you that Ferrari motor was not turned up to its full potential. In saying that race pace is everything and if u say Vettel was on the edge how do speak of Kimi. He posted the fastest lap of the race and that was on well used tires so lets be honest and say that Merc have allot of catching up to do cause being fastest in Spain and now Aus says a whole lot about Ferrari's title challenge. Im not saying the Silver Arrows is slow, just saying dont blame tire wear and pit stops on not finishing first, cause even if Hamilton was in front after the stops im sure Vettel would of found a way passed. All im saying now, is bring in China. Forza Scuderia Ferrari��
elbowz said…
Thanks for your comment Vinolan. Actually I'm very far from being a Mercedes supporter and I very much hope that Vettel prevails to win the Championship this year.

In clear air running, after Hamilton had cleared Verstappen, the Mercedes was one to two tenths of a second faster than the Ferrari. Vettel did a much better job with traffic than either Mercedes driver and the top three cruised out the last few laps holding station.

Kimi's fast laps at the end were as a result of Verstappen getting close enough to put him under pressure. Last few laps aside Kimi was three to four tenths slower than Vettel. His race pace was never good enough to challenge Bottas for third.

I don't know whether your assertion that the Ferrari engine was turned down is correct or not, let's certainly hope so. Another Ferrari win in China would be welcome and certainly add excitement to the season to come.

Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…

WhartonBrooks Indiegogo Windows 10 Mobile Even More Doomed To Failure Than Usual

WhartonBrooks is currently crowd-funding its latest Windows Mobile smartphone on Indiegogo. If crowdfunding isn't already a bad enough idea, a company trying to crowdfund a Windows Mobile device should be warning enough for you.
Not that anyone seems to be taking the project too seriously. With a few weeks left to run the campaign has managed to ensnare just 2% of its $1.1m target.
If you want a better indication of how few Window Mobile loyalists remain I doubt there is one. Of 3,900 Windows Phone enthusiasts Wharton Brooks was seeking for its new phone, it has managed to entice just 50.
Windows for Phones is dead, even if the corpse hasn't stopped twitching yet.