Skip to main content

Confused Of Cupertino, What Does Apple Have Planned For New iPad Range

Over the last couple of months we've been hearing more and more rumours about a three device iPad launch for the end of March. The crux of which is that the two iPad Pro models will get a refresh and a new, edge to edge screen iPad, sporting a 10.5" display in the same size chassis as the smaller iPad Pro, will join the line-up.

I've already written about my disappointment in the apparent abandonment of the iPad Mini. Now the credibility of these rumours needs to be called into question.

The iPad Pro was the focus of a big push into the booming hybrid market. It hasn't been an unqualified success. Possibly because the iPad Pro has a much more focused market than an equivalent Windows 10 hybrid.

Customers weighing up the possibility of having one device to cover all of their computing and tablet needs are increasingly finding that the right answer is a Windows detachable - of which there are a variety of choices and prices which cover many more use cases than the limited selection the iPad Pro can address.

Is Apple's response to this challenge likely to be a light upgrade of the Pro and a new screen size? It seems unlikely. Apple has been pushing the iPad as a computer message everywhere and frequently, in an expensive ad campaign.

Maybe it's clearing the decks to make way for an entirely new iPad range which does away with the old designs and limitations. 

In that case selling the older model at its usual $100 reduction - a regular tactic for year old machines - is going to be a big ask. Especially if falling sales have left Apple with a large inventory. This would validate the ad campaign and put those rumours of new designs into a new light.

In fact it's the only way I can see a new three model range makes any kind of sense.

When we get new iPads I believe Apple will have rather more to offer than a warmed over range. Too many sales are being lost to the competition to believe anything else.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…