Skip to main content

Bear's Arrival Makes Evernote's Position Look Precarious


Evernote has been a player in the note taking market for almost a decade. Despite being a ground breaker for advanced note taking services, cross device synchronisation and a host of other clever features, Evernote looks to be on the back foot.

OneNote's freely available client on all platforms took a bite out of Evernote's mind share. OneNote is more capable and has benefited hugely from Microsoft's focus on touch and pen in Windows 8 and Windows 10. 

I spend an interminable amount of time in meetings and I haven't seen anyone using anything but OneNote for so long you'd think everyone else has given up on competing. Even Mac users exclusively use OneNote.

Having lost out to the heavy hitters who value OneNote's advanced features you'd expect Evernote to target the less serious notetakers, who need less of the features and more of the speed and convenience.

Unfortunately Apple has made its Notes app on iOS and Mac OS so good it's hard to see Evernote making any kind of dent into that particularl niche. Google is doing the same with Keep on Android and Chrome.

So Evernote has been left with the middle ground. Those users who have used the product for years and haven't the stomach for migration; and those users who need more than Notes / Keep but less than OneNote.

That niche might be closing though, if the growing chatter around a product called Bear is to be believed. Bear is a purely Apple focused product and, like the majority of products for that ecosystem, looks clean, with a well planned UI. It looks like a great product to use.

Not only that, but feedback from high profile Mac bloggers and current Evernote users is that Bear is good enough to persuade them to go through the pain of migrating their notes.

Evernote looks to be in abad place, and it needs to rediscover its mojo if it's to overcome the challenges facing it and retain a viable business.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…