Skip to main content

Nokia And Blackberry Hoping Old Is The New Black

The Nokia 3310 and Blackberry KeyOne are two phones that arrive in 2017 with an unhealthy dose of 2007 coursing through their veins. Popular as the originals may have been neither device has a place in the modern Parthenon of mobile devices.

Let's start with the 3310, which is a shameless play for the nostalgia vote in emerging markets. It promises few of the virtues of the original - to wit, never ending battery life and virtual indestructibility, lacks smartphone features that even the most basic of users might demand and those it does offer are just too low end.

This is a mobile phone for people who just want to make calls. In pretty much every other respect it offers little. Symbian Series 30 in 2017? That's just ridiculous. 

Customers in emerging markets need value for money devices, not cheap tat. HMD's best potential market for this is hipsters looking for something to add an element of ironic cool to their grab bag.

The Blackberry KeyOne potentially fails for a different reason. Customers have pretty much abandoned the concept of physical keyboards on their phones - even keyboards as clever as that offered by Blackberry, with capacitive touch and multiple shortcut capability.

The KeyOne is a mid-range phone, most likely to appeal to the few business people still using their classic Blackberry devices. However it is packaged with decidedly mid-range specs, a small screen and a limited range of consumer friendly features which suggest a mid-range price.

To everyone except Blackberry. After its last two over-priced flops, you'd think the company would learn. Instead the KeyOne is priced right at the top of the market. Unless retailers are going to be offering steep discounts on the suggested price, stock is going to grow Old on warehouse shelves.

The world has moved on from physical keyboards, the market is too competitive to support overpriced phones and TCL seems to have missed both of these key messages with the KeyOne.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…