Skip to main content

Newspapers And Journalism In A Disrupted Market

It has been interesting to watch the increasingly desperate attempts by newspaper publishers to save their industry. Different methods have been employed - from asking readers to disable ad blockers through pay-walls and even pleading for donations.

Thing is, nobody seems to have it worked out. Not if they want to report actual news rather than chase viral page views with garbage articles like the Daily Mail or Buzz Feed.

The only model that seemed to briefly work for publishers was ad-supported, where they were able to convert large numbers of page views into an income stream.

As we all know, the quality and intrusion of advertising was not kept in check, giving rise to the ad-blocking Godzilla, which has stomped all over Fleet Street's online city.

The inability to derive revenue has destroyed the hoped for migration of the newspaper empires to the web. News sources are everywhere and in the main they don't have the weight of a legacy organisation to support.

As a result the past ability of newspapers to bundle together a mix of reporting, advertising and a political agenda is being wiped away. 

Without the checks and balances which kept newspaper reporting at least in the general vicinity of the truth, newer sites have been able to claim, report or fabricate whatever stories support their own agenda. Fake news, alternative facts? The root cause is right here.

So how does the traditional press reorganise to face a change in the market that has already bypassed them? Has the window of opportunity closed?

The subscription model may work for some of the larger names, but in general news reporting has lost its value. The internet not only killed printed news by its constant stream of up to date reporting but also killed the value of news itself. An almost infinite supply does that to products.

So the real value in the old publishing corporations is what they do outside of the news: commentary, long-form articles, investigative journalism, sociopolitical engineering. These key skills developed in the old media days haven't been picked up by new media companies in their rush for click throughs and page views.

This is where a subscription model could work. In the same way that the music industry came together to enable Spotify, the big newspaper publishers need to come together and create an offering which leverages their combined strengths.

Take the capability of the big names in news publishing around the world and centralise their non-news content into a subscription service which is priced below the point of resistance ($10 per month for example), distribute that revenue on a 'per play' basis and you have a model which is sustainable.

Because, whilst the potential market for a subscription to The Times or Washington Post is low, the global market isn't if it includes a subscription for The Times, The Washington Post, The Guardian, Bild, La Republica, and so on.

Whether the very diverse and often warring factions that form the newspaper empires can come together to do this remains very much in question. If they can't then a fate worse than the Daily Mail awaits them.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…

WhartonBrooks Indiegogo Windows 10 Mobile Even More Doomed To Failure Than Usual

WhartonBrooks is currently crowd-funding its latest Windows Mobile smartphone on Indiegogo. If crowdfunding isn't already a bad enough idea, a company trying to crowdfund a Windows Mobile device should be warning enough for you.
Not that anyone seems to be taking the project too seriously. With a few weeks left to run the campaign has managed to ensnare just 2% of its $1.1m target.
If you want a better indication of how few Window Mobile loyalists remain I doubt there is one. Of 3,900 Windows Phone enthusiasts Wharton Brooks was seeking for its new phone, it has managed to entice just 50.
Windows for Phones is dead, even if the corpse hasn't stopped twitching yet.