Skip to main content

How I Roll: Lightweight Travel Version


I've covered my technology bag a few times in the past, so for 2017 I'm going to do things a little differently and talk about how I make my daily carry match my changing daily requirements. First off, my lightest bag.

I commute by three different methods - primarily by ferry across Auckland Harbour into the CBD. It's a fifteen minute journey during which I can catch up with email, read an eBook or catch up on the news.

Occasionally I'll make the journey by car, meaning that I get to the office(s) a little more quickly and can be a little more relaxed about the amount of technology I carry.

Finally I regularly fly between Auckland and Wellington or Melbourne. Usually these are overnight visits at a minimum.

For the days when I'm on the ferry I tend to pack the lightest bag I can carry. The bag I'll usually take will be an old HP netbook neoprene sleeve case. Unlike most neoprene sleeves this has a handle and a front pocket.

The main pocket carries my Surface 3, which doubles as PC and tablet. In tablet mode its an ideal eBook reader, magazine reader (using Zinio) or web browser. I no longer feel the need to carry a separate tablet.

In the front pocket I have my business iPhone, a USB-C cable for my Xperia XZ, Lightning cable and a micro-USB cable for the Surface 3. The Sony's charger will charge each of my three devices, and the Surface 3's USB port allows me to charge a second device if required.

The final item  in my pack is an RSA token for remote access (using the iPhone as a Wifi hotspot if necessary).

It's a small bag which lets me get things done. It seems a shame that Microsoft hasn't updated the Surface 3 recently, but similar devices abound from other Windows OEMs, mostly based around the more powerful Intel Core m3 or i5 CPUs.

For times when I need to get the maximum bang for portable buck this setup works very well indeed.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…