Skip to main content

Did Nikon Just Make Itself An Apple Acquisition Target?

Looks like Nikon had a particularly bad time of it in 2016 and yesterday it broke news of its plans to adapt its business for 2017. Out go employees - around 1,000 of them and into the bin go its plans for a new range of premium compacts.

Financially the year ending in March looks to be a pretty poor one for the company's shareholders. Its P/E ratio is close to its 12 month low suggesting this might be a good time for someone looking to acquire optical and image processing know how and patents. Someone sitting on a large pile of cash and being criticised by shareholders for failing to work it hard enough.

Someone like Apple for example.

The iPhone has almost single-handedly demolished the compact camera market and seriously impacted businesses like Nikon. It is the most popular camera on a whole range of social media websites. It is the ultimate expression of the old adage 'the best camera is the one you have with you' and with the iPhone 7 and 7+ Apple has shown that it is serious about improving the quality of the camera you have with you.

Apple benefits from this acquisition by giving itself another outlet for sales to existing iPhone owners and add-on sales to new iPhone buyers. Think about something like the Sony QX10 lens camera, which added serious photography chops to a smartphone, even if the implementation was (typically for modern day Sony) flawed.

Now imagine that same concept engineered by Apple, utilising Nikon camera know-how, specifically designed for the iPhone and leveraging proprietry communications to resolve the Sony's main problem areas. With Apple's marketing chops and customer loyalty it could easily drive a new, multi-billion dollar product line for Apple.

Just because the camera you have with you is the best you have, it doesn't mean the camera you have with you shouldn't be the best it can be. There's an opportunity here, if Apple is sharp and ready to roll the dice.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…