Skip to main content

The Apple App Store Monopoly


A US Appeals court has given iPhone customers leave to sue over the App Store monopoly, potentially opening a path to third party App Stores on iOS. In the same week that Apple announced 60% growth in App Store revenue and confirmed $20bn was paid to developers in 2016, its a bad time for this news to break. The Appeals Court overturned an earlier ruling and reopens the question of Apple's app sales policy.

Apple's argument has always been that customers don't deal with Apple, they deal with individual developers. However the Appeals Court based its decision on customers paying Apple for the apps. It can hardly deny any interest in the transaction with this being the case. Even Apple's secondary argument that developers paid for space in the App Store (via the premium it pays to Apple on each sale) was rendered moot once Apple began demanding payment for subscriptions, as well as dictating how much apps and content could be sold for outside of the App Store.

Apple fans argue that Apple cannot possibly hold a monopoly when Android owns the larger share of the market. This argument is nonsense. The App Store is the only way (short of jail breaking) iOS customers can get apps for their devices. And publishers can only access those customers by following Apple's very specific rules. With upwards of one billion device owners out there unable to go anywhere else for apps that sounds like a monopoly to me.

As a minimum Apple should be forced to allow third-party stores to be installed onto iOS devices. If the precedent of Windows and Internet Explorer is followed, then it should be forced to pre-install third-party stores too.

What I find perplexing is the EU, which makes so much noise about monopolies has completely failed to even investigate the legitimacy of the iOS / App Store lock-in. The legal system being what it is in the US, this has a long way to go before any kind of definitive decision is made.

Some pressure from the EU could move things on an awful lot quicker.

I don't see a defeat on this item as particularly affecting Apple. Customers will likely choose to use the App Store even if other options are available. Android customers have certainly stuck with the Play Store. However it's that freedom of choice which iOS owners are currently being denied.

Whether they want it or not is a different matter entirely.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…

WhartonBrooks Indiegogo Windows 10 Mobile Even More Doomed To Failure Than Usual

WhartonBrooks is currently crowd-funding its latest Windows Mobile smartphone on Indiegogo. If crowdfunding isn't already a bad enough idea, a company trying to crowdfund a Windows Mobile device should be warning enough for you.
Not that anyone seems to be taking the project too seriously. With a few weeks left to run the campaign has managed to ensnare just 2% of its $1.1m target.
If you want a better indication of how few Window Mobile loyalists remain I doubt there is one. Of 3,900 Windows Phone enthusiasts Wharton Brooks was seeking for its new phone, it has managed to entice just 50.
Windows for Phones is dead, even if the corpse hasn't stopped twitching yet.