Skip to main content

Samsung Confirms Galaxy S8 Delay Whilst Revealing Note 7 Inquest Results

Samsung regained a lot of credibility with the openness of its Note 7 battery investigations, the results of which have been widely published and critiqued, so I won't do the same here.

Just as important was the message that the Galaxy S8 won't be revealed at MWC - breaking from tradition.

It's a positive sign that Samsung hasn't just placed the blame on battery manufacture but understands the root cause of the debacle - a rush to beat the iPhone 7 to market and the shortcuts in the review and testing of design decisions which resulted.

More than anything it remind me of the actions of British Leyland in the 70s. So caught up in the day to day need to respond to new competition from Europe and Japan, as well as the home grown competition from Ford and Vauxhall, that products were rushed to market, half-finished and with significant quality control issues.

At the start of the seventies the British motor industry dominated car sales across half the world, by the end of the decade the company was fatally wounded and within two more it was gone.

Samsung's problems might not run so deep, but failing to recognise them would have been the first step down a similar path to BL. So the news that the GS8 will be delayed should be considered to be a positive sign for the company. It means that Samsung will have time to implement the eight step battery safety plan it proposed as part of its report, it means it will have more time to undertaken real time testing of production prototypes before getting close to production and, most importantly, it will have time for the review of design decisions made long before any GS8s make it into the hands of customers.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…